Sunday, March 30, 2014

The tax trap


A fact based opinion.

Who benefits and who loses when income taxes are decreased and sales tax increased?
A regressive tax is a tax imposed in such a manner that the tax rate decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases. In terms of individual income and wealth, a regressive tax imposes a greater burden (relative to resources) on the poor than on the rich — there is an inverse relationship between the tax rate and the taxpayer's ability to pay as measured by assets, consumption, or income. These taxes tend to reduce the tax incidence of people with higher ability-to- pay, as they shift the incidence disproportionately to those with lower ability-to-pay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regressive_tax

An example of a regressive tax that applies to all earners:
Social Security tax is an example. For 2007, you pay 6.2% tax on wages up to a maximum wage of $97,500. Therefore:
a. A person who makes $30,000 a year pays $1,860 (30,000*.062) in tax or 6.2% of wages. \
b. A person who makes $200,000 a year pays $6,045 (97,500*.062) in tax or 3% of wages. 
c. A person who makes $500,000 a year still pays $6,045 in tax (97,500*.062) or 1.2% of wages.
Since the richest people pay the smallest percentage of their income in tax, it is a regressive tax.

The Social Security tax definition is not a pure example due to the return of the tax to the payer upon retirement

A better example of a regressive tax is the sales tax. Money spent to buy essential and nonessential items that have a sales tax of 7 percent, for example, hits those with a lower income harder than it hits higher-income individuals. Fees are another example of a regressive tax, because lower-income individuals pay a larger percentage of their income for them. Examples are toll roads, licenses, admission to museums and parks, and parking. A third example of a regressive tax is an excise tax, which is a tax on the production or sale of certain commodities such as alcohol, cigarettes, firearms, gasoline, air travel and telephone services. Excise taxes are typically hidden taxes because they are incorporated into the price of the commodity without consumers' realizing it.

At some income level, dollars not used for consumption escape the sales tax.
Paul Hunter


Friday, March 28, 2014

Ohio Health Update

Ohio County health outcome ranking.


Representative Cliff Rosenberger's District 91 and a part of Senator Bob Peterson's 17th district.

The Ohio House of Representatives, including our Rep. Rosenberger filed a protest letter against the governor's attempt to unilaterally expand Ohio's Medicaid program.


Clinton County:
Seventy-fifth for health outcome
seventy-fourth in life span
Sixty-fourth in quality of life

Highland County:
Seventy-ninth for health outcomes.
Eighty-fifth in life span.
Seventy-fifth in quality of life.

Pike County:
Eighty-third for health outcomes.
Eighty-fourth in life span.
Eighty-first in quality of life.

The Ohio House of Representatives, including our Rep. Rosenberger filed a protest letter against the governor's attempt to unilaterally expand Ohio's Medicaid program.

For comparison:
Delaware County:
Third best of for health outcomes
Second in life span
Third in quality of life.

Scioto County:
Eighty eighth for health outcomes.
Eighty-eighth for life span
Eighty-seventh in quality of life.


See web site for detailed explanation.
Paul Hunter



Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Wilmington School District



The Ten Top Compensated Wilmington

School Employees 2013/2014 School Year

Name Title Total Comp.*
Ed Blohm Director H/R/AD $133,846
Ronald Sexton Superintendent $126,514
Nicole Quallen Dir.of Instruction $124,718
Natalie Harmeling Pupil Services $122,532
Matt Freeman Middle Sch. Princip. $118,739
Brian Camp Asst. HS Principal $118,032
Kim Deweese Treasurer $117,967
Curt Bone Business Director $116,617
Shannon Koblentz Holmes Principal $113,660
Brent Carey H/S Principal $113,148
Base Data From The School Treasurer

*Compensation includes all district paid benefits
Compiled by Paul Hunter


Monday, March 24, 2014

Bait and Switch


When a tax cut is not a tax cut; an editorial.
Our Governor successfully pushed for state income tax reduction in the last budget and wants to reduce the tax even further in the new budget.
Sounds good right?
In September 2013 income tax rates decreased by 8.5%. Good for the big earner not so much for the little earner.
For example: A taxpayer with taxable earnings of $40,000 saves a whopping $156 per year while a fellow resident with earnings of $500,000 saves $3,800*.

At the same time a sales tax increase took effect, resulting in this possible scenario:
A Clinton county resident earning $40,000 uses his savings from the income tax reduction to purchase a $30,000 car and would pay 6% of his income in sales tax. His more frugal neighbor earning $500,000 would pay a mere ½% of 1% of income for the same purchase.
The last budget bill drastically cut the amount of income and sales taxes that residents send to Columbus each year and that was returned for local services. The result of this reduction results in local schools and governments having to either cut services or ask for increased local taxes.
http://www.policymattersohio.org/local-gov-jul2013
In 2007 the state instituted a new homestead property tax exemption for home owners over the age of 65.
http://ohioline.osu.edu/ss-fact/pdf/0206.pdf

In the latest budget, the homestead Exemption is being scaled back. Everyone currently receiving the exemption is grandfathered in – they won’t lose their tax break. But now, new applicants to the program will only be eligible if they make less than $30,000 a year. If our $40,000 a year man owned a $100,000 home and became age 65 this year his property tax bill will increase by as much as $300 per year over those already receiving the exemption.. Any new tax levies will cost an additional 12.5% as a result of changes in property tax law.



Paul Hunter contact at paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Water and Waste Water Ain't Free

Utility Costs
Each year the City of Oakwood (near Kettering) compiles a list of sewer and water rates from information supplied by 66 jurisdictions in Southwest Ohio including Wilmington.


Rates are based the consumption of 22,550 gallons of water over a three month period
Wilmington's ranking:.
2012
Sewer: 18th highest @ $131 (Loveland was #1 at $211 and Dayton #66 at $70.)
Water: 5th highest @ $136 (Tipp City was #1 at $185 and Fairfield was #66th at $55.
Water +sewer 12th highest @ $267 (Troy was #1 at $375 and Union was #66 @ $133
2013
Sewer
Water: 7th highest @ $136 (Tipp City $198 and Enon #66 at $55)
Sewer: 20th highest @ $131 (Troy $226 and Dayton $72
Water + sewer 12th highest (Troy $419 and Union $133.

Compiled by Paul Hunter

Monday, March 17, 2014

Our State Senator


Bob Peterson's Political Summary 


Gender:
Male
Family:
Wife: Lisa; 3 Children: Sarah, Hannah, Todd
Birth Date:
03/15/1962
Birth Place:
Chillicothe, OH
Home City:
Sabina, OH
Religion:
Christian

special interest grades:
National Rifle Association (a de facto gun manufacturers lobby) 92% http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/11/nra-gun-control-firearms-industry-ties_n_2434142.html
Ohio Federation of Teachers 0% (see vote to reduce school funding below) http://oh.aft.org/about-us

Total Campaign Contributions: $172,404 http://votesmart.org/candidate/95755/bob-peterson#.UycPEPldV_4
Top Contributor: Self $27,000
Second Highest: Ginni Ragan (Elder care Aging Medicaid expansion Advocate) $11,000
Lowest sector Labor $600
Votes
Prohibits Internet Cafes: Yea
Expands Gambling Yea
Prohibits “Jobs Ohio” (a quasi public entity that spends tax payer's money) from being publicly audited. Yea & Sponsor
Amends definition of a loaded gun: Yea (Definition of unloaded firearm in a vehicle
A firearm in a vehicle now will be considered unloaded if there is no ammunition in the firearm in question, and no magazine or speed loader containing ammunition is inserted into the firearm in question. Before amendment ammo had to be inaccessible )
Repeals limits on credit card interest rates for certain banks. Yea http://www.lsc.state.oh.us/fiscal/fiscalnotes/129ga/hb0322in.pdf
Prohibits texting while driving nay(?)
Prohibit insurance coverage of abortions Yea
Resolution supporting change to Ohio Constitution banning most if not all provisions of the Afforable Health Care Act Yea
Concealed guns in Barrs and clubs Yea
Suspension of collective bargaining rightsfor public employees Yea (bill repealed by Ohio voters)
Reduce required school funding Yea

Compiled by Paul Hunter

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Crime and Punishment in the 21st century



Good and evil in the brain scan age.

Would justice have been served if Whitman had survived and been executed?
Charles Joseph Whitman (June 24, 1941 – August 1, 1966) was an American engineering student and former U.S. Marine, who killed sixteen people and wounded thirty-two others in a mass shooting rampage in and around the Tower of the University of Texas at Austin on the afternoon of August 1, 1966. Three people were shot and killed inside the university's tower and eleven others were murdered after Whitman fired at random from the 28th-floor observation deck of the Main Building. Whitman was shot and killed by Austin police officer Houston McCoy.


In fact, Whitman complained of headaches and an altered mental state in the days and weeks leading up to the killings. His own suicide note read that "I do not really understand myself these days. I am supposed to be an average reasonable and intelligent young man. However, lately (I cannot recall when it started) I have been a victim of many unusual and irrational thoughts."
Whitman knew that something was wrong. His note further reads, "After my death I wish that an autopsy would be performed on me to see if there is any visible physical disorder." And indeed there was. Whitman was found to have a glioblastoma, a type of brain tumor, pressing against regions of the brain thought to be responsible for the regulation of strong emotions.

In this era of brain scans and analysis two things could have occurred, a. He would have undergone surgery to remove the tumor prior to acting out or, b. The tumor would have been discovered after the shooting and a jury might have acquitted him based on brain science.

Was Mr. Whitman evil or just sick.?

Would justice have been served if this man had been locked up for life?
In 2000, an otherwise normal Virginia man started to collect child pornography and make sexual advances toward his prepubescent stepdaughter. He was sentenced to spend time in a rehabilitation center, only to be expelled for making lewd advances toward staff members and patients. The next step was prison, but the night before he was to be incarcerated, severe headaches sent him to the hospital, where doctors discovered a large tumor on his brain. After they removed it, his sexual obsessions disappeared. Months later, his interest in child pornography returned, and a scan showed that the tumor had come back. Once again it was removed, and once again his obsessions disappeared.

Was the man evil or just sick?


Paul Hunter