According to a
report in the 8/9/14 Wilmington News Journal a consultant to the city
council's water committee, a $10 per month surcharge is the
recommended method to raise the required funding for continued
operation of the city water department.
When it was pointed
out during the council meeting that this placed an unfair cost share
on senior and small family users, the committee chair Mark McKay
stated that they didn't want to hit big users of water to hard
because it might scare away potential businesses. In effect, such a
system would cause the small and often low and moderate income user
to subsidize the large users.
Examples. Mrs. Smith
lives alone and uses an average of 4,000 per month. She pays $5.84
per one thousand gallons or a total of $23.36 plus a $1.40 fixed
cost. The $10 surcharge would cost the lady an equivalent increase of
$2.50 per 1,000 gallons.
ABC corporation uses
100,000 gallons per month and the $10 surcharge would cost the
company an equivalent increase of ten cents per thousand gallons.
There is a better
approach to increasing revenue that would that, at best, cost the
utility bill payer nothing or, at worst, a much smaller increase in
user cost then the surcharge idea.
Paul Hunter budhunter@frontier.com
No comments:
Post a Comment