I have been analyzing landfill issues for the
past four years and, from time to time, addressed council on the
subject.
Below is my response to the Mayor’s
comments as published in the 7/30/14 Wilmington News Journal.
1.No change in current operations is not an
option as the OEPA has asserted that the City of Wilmington cannot own and
operate its own landfill.
Response: According to Russell Brown from the Dayton office
of the OEPA’s landfill division, ““We are often asked if we are Pro or Con on
the topic of landfills. And the answer is that we are neutral. We don’t have an
opinion regarding who owns and operates a landfill, our focus is that it is done
correctly”
2. Immediate sell.
Response: In my opinion, if a buyer could be found the only
way that the buyer could gain a return on investment would be to bring in large
amounts of outside the county and/or state solid waste and build a mountain of
trash within the city limits and increase truck traffic on Nelson. Nearby
neighbors have already spoken to this issue at the public meeting)
3.Immediate Lease
Response: Basically the same objections as immediate sale.
In their recent proposal Santek indicated that they would increase the daily
tipping rate of 65 tons per day toward the maximum allowable of 195 tons per
day.
4. Immediate closure.
Response: The recent expansion of landfill capacity has
added years of use at current tipping rates and has been completed.
5. Zero Waste
Response: A viable and responsible idea but difficult and
expensive to implement. We have borrowed some time with the expansion to work
out the details.
6. Privatize solid waste
responsibility.
Response: Certainly worth studying for a long term
solution after the current facility is to be closed. This option must meet performance accountability standards.
Business as usual is not an option.
Response: This is the best option for the near and mid term
period. The landfill is self supporting and with local effort can have several
years of useful life.
Note: The cost of closing a landfill varies greatly. A
supply of good clay dirt is a major cost factor. Fortunately we have a lot of
that material on site according to landfill personnel. One online source offers
this estimate:
In 2013 dollars the cost of the actual closure
would be $1,411,201. The continuing monitoring and maintenance cost over the 30
years post closing would be $2,463,094 or $82,000 per year.
When deliberating the need to lower rates to
increase outside tipping has proven counterproductive because the value of
landfill airspace has been disregarded. Calculations using the current expansion
cost and airspace gained results in a $7 per cubic yard of airspace value.
Paul Hunter
No comments:
Post a Comment