When
a tax cut is not a tax cut; an editorial.
Our
Governor successfully pushed for state income tax reduction in the
last budget and wants to reduce the tax even further in the new
budget.
Sounds
good right?
In
September 2013 income tax rates decreased by 8.5%. Good for the big
earner not so much for the little earner.
For
example: A taxpayer with taxable earnings of $40,000 saves a whopping
$156 per year while a fellow resident with earnings of $500,000 saves
$3,800*.
At
the same time a sales tax increase took effect, resulting in this
possible scenario:
A
Clinton county resident earning $40,000 uses his savings from the
income tax reduction to purchase a $30,000 car and would pay 6% of
his income in sales tax. His more frugal neighbor earning $500,000
would pay a mere ½% of 1% of income for the same purchase.
The
last budget bill drastically cut the amount of income and sales taxes
that residents send to Columbus each year and that was returned for
local services. The result of this reduction results in local schools
and governments having to either cut services or ask for increased
local taxes.
http://www.policymattersohio.org/local-gov-jul2013
In
2007 the state instituted a new homestead property tax exemption for
home owners over the age of 65.
http://ohioline.osu.edu/ss-fact/pdf/0206.pdf
In
the latest budget, the homestead
Exemption is being scaled back. Everyone currently receiving the
exemption is grandfathered in – they won’t lose their tax break.
But now, new applicants to the program will only be eligible if they
make less than $30,000 a year.
If our
$40,000 a year man owned a $100,000 home and became age 65 this year
his property tax bill will increase by as much as $300 per year over
those already receiving the exemption..
Any new tax levies will cost an additional 12.5% as a result of
changes in property tax law.
Paul
Hunter contact at paulhunter45177@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment