Kasich Flirts With Flat Tax
Beware presidential wanabes seeking big money donations. After
all, the working poor wont/can't contribute to campaigns against
their own interests. Can Kasich say “income inequality”? I didn't
think he could.
From the DDN: As he toys with running for president, Gov. John
Kasich also is flirting with another idea: Backing a variation of
magazine publisher Steve Forbes’ plan to overhaul the federal tax
code[by instituting a flat tax]. If he follows his Ohio model he
would also include a sales tax at the federal level.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/encyclopedia/Flat-Tax.cfmA
central issue in tax reform is always who wins and who loses. Under
the
flat tax, low-income households would lose because they now
pay no income
tax and are eligible for a refundable EITC of up to
$3,370. Although the
flat tax is more progressive than a VAT
[sales tax], it is more regressive than the
current system. A
flat tax would provide huge gains for high-income
households
because their marginal tax rate would fall..... As a result, if
a
flat tax were to raise as much revenue as the current system, the tax
burden for the middle class would have to rise. Consumption taxes
would raise tax burdens on lower-and middle-income households over
any time frame.
Posted by Paul Hunter
No comments:
Post a Comment