Sunday, September 29, 2013

It's Our Money




At the September 19th city council meeting the council voted to spend $8,400 of Wilmington taxpayers money to demolish a privately owned house at 142 N. Mulberry St.

The motion to spend was made without explanation or discussion and was passed unanimously.

In my opinion this demolition is, in fact, an improvement to the property for the property owner's benefit. A building lot with a deteriorating and unsafe building is of very little value but a cleared and vacant lot in the heart of the city has considerable value. Without delving into the legal aspects of the situation it seems to me that the city should a least attempt to repay the taxpayers by taking ownership of the improved parcel for resale or development.

Adding to the situation is the fact that the property owner has not paid taxes on the property for three or four years and it is considered a delinquent account. This fact might fit the state state statute referenced below. If it does apply it could offer a means for the city to recoup some or all of the money as well as getting rid of a dangerous eyesore. If anyone has additional knowledge of the legalities please contact me or, better yet, contact council's clerk at: bwoods@ci.wilmington.oh.us or 382-5458

Ohio Revised CODE (ORC) 5722.21 Acquisition of tax-delinquent real property for redevelopment free from lien for delinquent taxes.

(B) The legislative authority of a municipal corporation may declare by ordinance that it is in the public interest for the municipal corporation, to acquire tax-delinquent real property within the municipal corporation,



Paul Hunter paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Friday, September 27, 2013

Lytle Creek Day
Saturday, October 5, 2013 
null
Please Join Us to Celebrate Lytle Creek Day      
      
Saturday, October 5, 2013 we will once again celebrate the special natural resource we have here in our own backyard - the Lytle Creek Greenway.  This year the Lytle Creek League of Conservators are privileged to celebrate in partnership withWilmington College as they commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Frank O. Hazard Arboretum.  The Arboretum is one of the "green" jewels along the Lytle Creek Greenway and a very fitting place to celebrate one of our community's special natural resources, Lytle Creek.  Wilmington College will be honoring the legacy of Dr. Hazard, as well as Fred Anliot. 
 
The Lytle Creek League of Conservators portion of the program includes the recognition for two outstanding local men - Dr. Frank Hazard, as Pioneer Conservator of the Year, for his legacy to Wilmington College and the natural world and Conservator of the Year for the steward of Hunter Glen, another node on the Lytle Creek Greenway.

Lunch will be served in a beautiful setting at the Frank O. Hazard Arboretum on Elm Street ($8, payable that day).  Parking is on Elm Street.  

The day of celebration features:
9:00 a.m. - Adventure Run      More Adventure Run Info Here
10:00 a.m. - Tree Walk conducted by the Wilmington Tree Commission (meet at the back of the YMCA parking lot)
11:00 -12:00 noon - Lunch is served
12:05 p.m. - Program begins
1:00 p.m. - Honorary tree-planting

Please join us as we celebrate our natural resources, reflect on the work that we have accomplished as a community in sustaining and improving upon them, and look forward to the bright future that they offer.
Submitted by Paul Hunter        
  
  
Please let us know if you will be joining us at lunch reservations here.  

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

In My Opinion

The Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Whether or not one is in favor of the so called Obama Care law, reasonable people expect the pros and cons of the issue to dealt with honestly and objectively.

Most of us have seen or heard the outlandish untruths from anti health care sources.

Just to name three:
If you are over age 77 under the ACA medicare will not cover cancer treatments.
If you are over age 77 ER doctors cannot admit you to the hospital.
The now famous or infamous, death panels.

Paul Hunter

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Rick Santorum is right, as in correct


Opinion
As a believer in a strong and effective two party system I would hope that both parties would be more representative of the diverse sectors of our nation. When a political party falls under the control of a minority of special interests, broad based representation is the first victim. By allowing money interests to trump voter interests, we are headed down a crooked path. Mr. Santorum's observation is most relevant to this subject

...........Earlier this summer, Rick Santorum said Republicans look like the party of plutocrats, stiffing working people and the poor.
The 2012 convention, he noted, was a parade of one-percenters, masters of the universe and company owners.“But not a single — not a single — factory worker went out there,” he said. “Not a single janitor, waitress or person who worked in that company! We didn’t care about them.” They still don’t care, and the darkening events of what looks to be an autumn of catastrophic failure by a Congress stuffed with extremists will prove Santorum’s point ever more...............



P. Hunter (as of 9/21 a newly minted octogenarian)






Friday, September 20, 2013

County Schools Costs




In this information furnished by the Wilmington City School District, the administrative costs per pupil is just a bit skewed because of the different student populations in each district. Having added that caveat, the numbers are never the less impressive, especially when compared to the state averages.

Administrative Costs Per Student

Wilmington  Clinton Massie  Blanchester  East Clinton   State Average
$819.19       $856.88            $1041.61     $1003.54       $1219.19

Total Expenditure Per Student

Wilmington  Clinton Massie   Blanchester  East Clinton  State Average
$8000.48      $8768.07          $7862.32     $8795.67       $10,597.21


Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Support For City Parks

Presentation to Council 

A couple of rhetorical questions

I ask the city fathers if you consider the local hospitality industry as the Visitors Bureau’s primary client?

If so, do you agree that city parks have a significant revenue impact on
those clients?
If so, would it be a good idea for city council, as many councils do, to
divert a portion of the bed tax to the cash poor and deteriorating city park
system? Such an action would allow the parks to continue providing a venue
for city-wide revenue enhancement.

For example, if the ball diamonds continue to deteriorate it will be
difficult to recruit area and statewide weekend tournaments that produce
significant revenue for the local economy.

In this period of economic distress when all sectors of the city are
sacrificing, a mere 7% of the bureau’s budget would fix the diamonds for
this year and allow upkeep of the parks to continue in follow on years.

The parks are an integral part of the city’s quality of life, especially for
the young folks. We used to be proud of our parks and we should not let them
become an embarrassment.

We have a dedicated, capable and efficient parks staff working as hard as
they can under difficult budget constraints to keep the system operating.
Isn’t it time to give them the respect they deserve? We don’t want to lose
any of these people to an otherwise improving economy.
Please excuse me for bringing Winston Churchill into the presentation but
his quote concerning the RAF in WW II could apply in this situation. “Never
have so many owed so much to so few.”

I encourage current members of, and candidates for, city office to consider
this issue during the run up to the election.


Paul Hunter

Monday, September 16, 2013

Thanks City Council & County Commissioners.

Thanks to electric aggregation I saved $45.40 on my DP&L bill this month. It looks like my savings this year will be around $500. That the equivalent of a huge 14 mill property tax levy. 
We need to share a very small portion of that savings by voting for a small 1.5 mill street levy that will indirectly allow a one time pay raise for our over used and under payed city employees  (no raises for the last 6 years). Experienced people are starting to leave. Even senior citizens get a raise in SS more often than that.   
Paul Hunter phunter45177@gmail.com



Sunday, September 15, 2013

You Can (Help) City Hall III

Right of Referendum

If you, as a voter in the city, have a strong feeling that a recently passed ordinance by city council is not in the residents best interest you can take action to undo the ordinance. Creating an ordinance that the voters desire but council refuses to pass may also be placed on the ballot.

As pointed out in the previous post of 9/13, the ability to unseat an elected official that has voted against your interests is problematical.

If other voters you know share your view It's time to consider taking out a petition in order to exercise your right of referendum.

The steps required for this action are established in state law and published in the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) in this instance section 731.29.
In brief, the law states: In most cases any ordinance or resolution passed by city council shall be subject to a referendum (ballot issue). No ordinance passed under normal procedures shall go into effect until 30 days after it is passed by council and presented to the Mayor. This period allows for a petition for referendum petition to be filed.

When a petition is signed by ten percent of the number of city voters that voted in the last governor's election the petition is filed with city auditor within the thirty day period. The auditor, in turn, sends the petition to the Board of Elections. The Board shall submit the ordinance to the voters of the city.

Ordinances that contain mandatory funding measures or that are passed as emergency measures go into effect immediately and are exempt from the referendum process.
The threat of the referendum process or of a tax payer's suit, as covered, in the 9/11 post, are tools that the activist can use to good effect. This poster used the referendum threat to obtain curbside recycling legislation and the threat of a taxpayer suit to force city employees to follow rules established by city council. In ordinances.
For more detail go to http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/731.28 and click next and previous as needed.

Paul Hunter (copy and paste if necessary) paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Friday, September 13, 2013

You Can Fight City Hall II



Why Fight?

There’s an old saying that you can’t fight City Hall, and win.but It’s just an old saying. I prefer the term, “help” city hall, not fight it. Helping the City to help itself is not a job for the timid or the apathetic citizen. It requires skin thick enough to repel institutional resistance and personal insults as well as endurance to see actions through to completion.

In single party dominated local politics our vote has little effect on the law making and enforcement process. Incumbent and newly elected officials have little cause to say, when faced with a legislative choice, “this is why I was elected”. In fact they were elected almost always because they were selected by their party and run unopposed in the general election.

With the above in mind the residents fact based free expression is the primary means of relating their concerns to the local legislators, be they school boards, city councils or county commissioners.

An example of helping is the perseverance and fact finding required to persuade the city and county governments to institute the electric aggregation program that is saving residents of those jurisdictions more than $2,000,000, and local governments tens of thousands per year in electricity charges.
I am currently working with the city fathers, to begin the process of aggregating natural gas service for city residents.

Over the past 20 years I have learned a lot about local politics and I have had some success in gaining cooperation from the legislators. Don't complain, put the act in activism!

P. Hunter (cut and paste eaddress) paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

You Can Fight City Hall I

If you can't afford a lawyer to bring legal action against the city, it's boards or officials you have a right under Ohio law to request, in writing, to be represented by the city Director of Law.
The Director of Law shall apply to the appropriate court for an order of injunction to restrain the misapplication of funds of the municipal corporation, the abuse of its corporate powers, or the execution or performance of any contract made in behalf of the municipal corporation in contravention of the laws or ordinance[s] governing it, or which was procured by fraud or corruption.
In case an officer or board of a municipal corporation fails to perform any duty expressly enjoined by law or ordinance, the village solicitor or city director of law shall apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for a writ of mandamus to compel the performance of the duty.
When a city contract involves a performance bond the city director of law shall apply for the forfeiture or the specific performance thereof as the nature of the case requires.
The taxpayer shall have the right to assist in presenting all issues of law and fact to the court in order that a full and complete adjudication of the controversy may be had.
If the city director of law fails, upon the written request of any taxpayer, to make any application provided for in sections 733.56 to 733.58 of the Ohio Revised Code, the taxpayer may institute suit in his own name, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
If the court hearing a case is satisfied that the taxpayer had good cause to believe that his allegations were well founded and based on legal principals the taxpayer shall be allowed his costs, and, if judgment is finally ordered in his favor, he may be allowed, as part of the costs, a reasonable compensation for his attorney in case the director of law fails to make the application.
Paul Hunter paulhhunter45177@gmail.com

.



Monday, September 9, 2013

Property Taxes Part IV


Property Taxes Part IV 

An owner of a $100,000 market/appraised value home any place Clinton County with a taxable/assessed value of $35,000* is taxed as follows:
*Ohio law limits taxable value to 35% of appraised value. Owners over the age of 65 receive a $25,000 reduction from appraised value.
For Wilmington owners:

Effective rates County
3 (.003) mills inside operating fund.
1.111 voted children services
1.274 mental Health (1997)
2.412 Mental Health ((2007)
.482 Health Department
1.447 Senior Citizens
Total effective 9.727 (.009727 x $35,000 = $340.45)

Effective rate city schools: School levies are at the state minimum level and cannot be reduced further.
4.2 (.0042) mills inside operating fund.
18.34 Voted
22.541 School Total

Great Oaks vocational
2.221 voted

City of Wilmington
2.6 inside general fund and safety pensions
2.509 Fire & EMS
1.17587 Police
1.25 Parks
7.534525 City total

Miscellaneous
.891 Recovery Services
.9845 Library
1.8754 Miscellaneous total

43.892925 (.043892925) Wilmington owner total x $35,000 = $1536.25 gross annual tax.
Ohio law stipulates a 12.5% roll back* for all owner occupied residences.
This reduces the tax due on the sample $100,000 Wilmington home to $1,344 per year plus street lighting assessment of around $30 per year.
*The State compensates the local tax revenue recipients for the roll back amount.

Space precludes giving examples of the 30 some county tax districts.
But here is a sampling of rates. Lynchburg 56.273946; New Vienna 49.015355; Midland 52;589477 Port William 47.173229; Blanchester 51.068904; Sabina 44.218293 and Clarksville 44.150180.

To obtain detailed information, including aerial photographs, on any Clinton County property go to: http://clintonoh.ddti.net/ and enter name or address in upper right block.

Note:.Wilmington Schools has a 1% income tax that taxes all income of district residents except Social Security and Military retired pay. Wilmington City has a 1% earnings tax that excludes pensions and other investment income.


If anyone has questions, corrections or comments concerng this or any other post please contact paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Property Taxes Part III

To expand on the effective millage covered in Part II: What if the total taxable value of property in the city went from $10 million, when the 1.25 mill levy was first passed, to $12 million at the next reappraisal?
In order not to exceed the revenue limit of $12,500 the millage would have to be reduced to 1.041 mills. The voted millage of 1.25 mills now has an effective millage of 1.041 (.001041)
The $100,000 market value, ($35,000 taxable value)) home owner had been paying: 00125 x $35,000 = $43.75 per year in gross taxes for the levy. At the reduced effective rate the owner would pay,.001041 x $35,000 = $36.44.

Note: Inside millage, unlike voted outside millage is never adjusted to an effective rate. The revenue rises and falls with the total taxable value of the district.

For the 2012 tax year, pay 2013, the Wilmington City-Wilmington School District residential property rate including voted outside mills plus inside mills totaled 50.825 mills, however, the effective rate is 43.892925 mills.

Union Township- Wilmington School District rates: Voted and inside 49.675 and Effective 43.36684

Note: Commercial-industrial rates differ from residential to some degree but the methodology remains the same.
Note. Voted levies have several different options for the voters..
Time Limited: Usually for five years at which time the levy must be placed on the ballot to be. a. Renewed at the existing effective rate. b. Replaced at the existing voted rate which nullifies any effective rate changes.(usually results in revenue increases) and c. Continuous no time limit this option saves costs and work involved in a ballot issue. Over the past several years Wilmington city council has made all city voted levies continuous.

All political subdivisions and other public agencies have the legal right to place property tax levies on the ballot. In Clinton County these entities include:
Public school districts, the County, the city, villages, townships and the Port Authority. Separate issues are voted for Senior, Mental health, Health  and Children services as well as Libraries.

In the next and final Part I will beak down each taxing district's levies and adjustments to the gross tax assessment.

Paul Hunter paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Thursday, September 5, 2013

School Funding Opinion


Money don’t matter in schools. It’s the unions damn it!

STANFORD, Calif. — AS school gets rolling across the country, many parents will be asked to make a large financial contribution to their children’s school. In Hillsborough, Calif., for example, parents receive a letter from the Hillsborough Schools Foundation in which the amount requested is $2,300 per child.............

..........Hillsborough is one of the wealthiest towns in the United States. Median family income is over $250,000, and residents enjoy one of the best school districts in the state. It’s not hard for Hillsborough families to donate to their own children’s school. And they do: bids at the foundation’s annual online auction last year went into the thousands for a paid internship at Franklin Templeton Investments and for a trip to the taping of the final episode of “The Bachelor.” Or you could make an offer on a vacation in a luxury home with a dedicated butler on a private island in Belize.

According to the foundation, charitable gifts have financed class-size reductions, librarians, art and music teachers, and Smart technology in every classroom. These funds supplement the annual public spending of $13,500 per pupil. In the process, they increase property values in Hillsborough. In 2012 private contributions to the foundation amounted to $3.45 million, or $2,300 per pupil.

School quality is connected to property value. Low household income limits Wilmington and Clinton County school districts funding but  a $15 per month* tax contribution  for local schools is an easy lift and a sound investment.
*cost of a 5 mill property tax levy on a $100,000 home

Paul Hunter

Property Taxes II




Before proceeding further it's time to understand some property tax terminology.

Market Value: T
he estimated sales value of the property. For purposes of real estate taxes, the county auditor determines the market value of all of the property in the county.

Taxable or Assessed Value:
The taxable value is determined by taking 35% of the market value of the property. For example, a home that would have a market value of $100,000 would have a taxable value of $35,000.

Re-appraisal: Every six years the county auditor appraises all of the properties to determine their market value. This is re-appraisal. Every three years, the county auditor does an update of the market values based on records of home sales.

Mills: One mill cost a property owner $1.00 for every $1,000 of taxable value.

Inside Millage; See Part I

Outside/Voted Millage: Outside millage is any millage "outside" the 10 mills limit. This millage is voted in by the public.

Example for explanation purposes only: Wilmington City Council determines that the inside millage does not provide sufficient funds for adequate police force operations. Council requests that the county auditor determine the outside mills required to provide an annual revenue of $12,500.
The auditor notes that the total taxable value of the city tax district $10,000,000 and that a 1.25 (.00125) mill levy will provide the required revenue. City council then places a 1.25 tax levy on the ballot for the next election. The voters then decide the issue. Note for practical purposes the levy revenue can never exceed the initial amount voted on even if the total tax value of the taxi district increases.
This feature is explained by “Effective Millage”

Effective Millage: The millage rate that is actually levied on property. Once a levy is voted in, a tax district cannot collect any additional money due to valuation increases from reappraisal on that levy. As property values increase, the millage rate on that voted levy is decreased so that the levy generates the same amount of money. When total value increases the tax amount individual property owners pay is educed. On the other hand if taxable value decreases the levy millage can never exceed the voted amount.

A small amount of additional money on voted millage will be realized from new construction or annexation.
Paul Hunter paulhunter45177@gmail.com

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

It's Your Money

Warning! This property tax series may put you to sleep.

During recent annexation discussions at recent city council meeting, a lack of property tax knowledge by most, if not all, participants became apparent and led to avoidable confusion.

I will attempt to share my knowledge in plain language, on this forum.

In Ohio most political subdivisions such as cites, counties, public schools and townships receive a significant portion of their operational revenue from taxes on property. Property tax is also called real estate or real property tax. All property taxes are collected by the county and distributed to the various local recipients. All of this revenue remains in the local area and is not shared with the state.

Schools and cities may also levy an income or earnings tax to supplement property tax revenue. Counties have the option of levying a sales tax in excess of the state sales tax.

Political subdivisions have the authority to levy some property taxes without the consent of the voters. However, this un-voted property tax, also know as inside milage, cannot exceed a total of 10 mills* Taxing districts, for example the City of Wilmington, Clinton County and Wilmington City schools are included in the 10 cap.
* one mill is equal to one dollar of taxes for each thousand dollars of taxable property value. (.001 X $1,000 = $1.00)

Current Inside mills for a Wilmington property owner:
2 mills (.002) City general operating fund.
.3 mills (.0003 Police pension fund.
.3 mills Fire pension fund.
3.00 mills County general operating fund.
4.2 mills Wilmington City Schools general operating fund.
9.8Total inside mills

A property owner in Union Township, Wilmington School District would pay 1 mill for Township operations and .2 mills for roads and bridges as well as the county and school inside levies. The total for Union Township is 8.4 mills.
End of inside mills section. The next installment will cover voter approved levies outside of the ten mill limit.

Paul Hunter paulhunter45177@gmal.com

Monday, September 2, 2013

Cold War Not So Cold

. Many brave airmen died, some from overstressed aircraft and others on secret missions.

Posted by Paul Hunter a SAC KC-97 tanker crewmember 1954-1962.

A Cold War RB-47E Over-Flight of the USSR
By Colonel Harold (Hal) Austin, USAF (Ret.)

The hot subject on both sides of the Iron Curtain in 1954 was Intelligence gathering. The political/military situation for the time period around May 8, 1954 was that the Cold War was in full swing and the Korean War was nearing the stalemate that has lasted for all of these 40 years. We were quite concerned about the possibility of the Soviets attacking Europe and even the United States with aircraft overflying Canada. Russia was equally as concerned about an attack by the United States.

Some of you will remember that by the 1954-55 time period we had two Strategic Reconnaissance Wings at Lockbourne AFB, Ohio, where my crew was stationed, with ninety RB-47E aircraft plus twenty KC-97 tankers. Also, there were two RB-36 Reconnaissance wings, one at Ellsworth AFB, SD and one at Fairchild AFB, WA. These were the aircraft expected to do the “Open Skies” project which President Eisenhower attempted to negotiate with the Soviet Union. It would have been very interesting trying to cover the entire Soviet Union with those 150 or so aircraft! In 1955 President Eisenhower made a careful evaluation of US policy on disarmament. He invited the other four major powers of the world to join in an agreement for the reduction of armaments and on July 21, 1955, at the Geneva Summit Conference, made his “Open Skies” proposal to ensure peace in the world through the use of aerial reconnaissance.

Editor' Note: Received the following info from Paul Hunter, March 6, 2005:

“There were two tanker units: The 26
th AREFS and the 91st, each with 20 97s. The 26th moved to Westover and they were replaced by the 376th SRW tanker unit but I don't recall the ARS number designator."
--Paul Hunter Member of the 91st AREFs 1954-1962--

During 1951-53, my unit, the 91st Strategic Recon Wing (SRW), routinely had about eight RB-45C’s and a similar number of KB-29P tankers deployed on temporary duty to England. In late 1953, we transitioned to the new RB-47E for the same job. During these years our “official” job was to do uncontrolled photo mapping work for the US Army over Europe, primarily the Rhine River basin and later all of Spain, so our maps could be geodetically tied into Eastern Europe. This was a very important requirement because ballistic missiles were soon to be deployed to the NATO area.

Our real mission with RB-45C’s, we found out later, was to occasionally furnish them to the RAF. (As a matter of interest, a flight of RB-45C’s, with RAF crews had been over Moscow the night of April 29, 1954, just a few days earlier than our day photographic mission.)

Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) RB-29’s, RB-50’s and later RB-47 aircraft, were also doing periphery work around the Soviet Union, primarily to keep the Soviet Radar Order of Battle up to date. I believe our overflight on May 8, 1954 was the first with the RB-47E visual photo aircraft.

On this particular TDY, my crew, Carl Holt, Co-pilot, and Vance Heavilin, Navigator, and myself, had been in England about two weeks, when on May 6 we launched a “feint” of seven RB-47’s toward the USSR’s “Northern Exposure.” Taking pictures of Spitsbergen Islands, Northwest of Norway, we were well above 75 degrees north latitude. Although we didn’t know it at the time, this “feint” was to set up our mission of the 8th of May. On the 8th of May, the three RB-47E crews for the mission were briefed separately and apart by two SAC Intel Colonels. Our particular mission was to penetrate Soviet airspace and take pictures of nine Soviet airfields to find out for General LeMay if the “new Migs” (MIG-17’s) were deployed to the area. We were also looking for deployed Bison Bombers. The other two aircraft were to proceed with us to a point about 100 miles north of Murmansk and then return to base.

Our flight of three RB-47s departed RAF Fairford about 7 AM, refueling with our KC-97’s off Norway as we had done two days earlier, flying one mile separation using station-keeping technique (very loose formation) to a point about 100 miles north of Murmansk. The other two aircraft reversed course, as briefed at that point to return to the UK. Our first Soviet airfield targets were two large airfields near Murmansk. We coasted in at 12 noon at nearly 40,000 feet over Murmansk and the Nav turned on his radar cameras and started the three K-17 large area visual photo cameras. The weather was clear as a bell across the entire Western part of the continent, perfect for our K-17 and K-38 cameras.

/*****US-FlightRB-47E-ReconnaissanceCrew-SecretFlightsMappingEasternEurope1954.jpg

About the time we finished photos of the second airfield, we were joined by a flight of 3 Soviet Migs. I still don’t know whether or not they were armed, but they stayed a couple hundred yards to half a mile off our wing, making visual identification, I guess. About 25 minutes later, a flight of six Migs showed up. I guess this flight confirmed we were the bad guys, because a few minutes later another two flights of three, a total of six Migs, arrived behind us, with obvious intent to try to shoot us down.

By this time, we had covered two more major airfield targets near Arkhangelsk and were turning to the Southwest toward our last two targets. We had been over Soviet territory an hour and were at 40,000 feet. We had been briefed by Intel that the Mig-15 would not be able to do any damage to us at 40,000 feet with our true air speed on the order of 440 knots.

Well, you can imagine what we called those Intelligence weenies as the first Soviet Mig-17, not Mig-15, made a firing pass on us from the left rear, and we saw cannon tracer shells going both above and below our aircraft. And, the Mig was still moving out rather smartly as he passed under us in front. So enough of this 40,000 feet stuff, I pushed the RB-47 over, descending a couple of thousand feet picking up about 20 knots indicated airspeed in the process. The second Mig-17 made his firing pass and I don’t care who knows, it was scary watching tracers go over and under our aircraft. This guy had almost come up our tailpipes. Fortunately, when the third Mig started his pursuit pass, our guns burped for a couple of seconds. General LeMay did not believe in tracers for our guns, but the Soviet pilots must have seen something because the third guy broke off his pass and the flight of six, and the next flight which joined us later, stayed out about 30 to 40 degrees to side, out of the effective envelope of our guns. Of course, the Migs didn’t know that our guns would not fire again, even though the Co-pilot pleaded, and I believe he did, at least, kick the panel trying to get them to work.

The fourth Mig of this flight made a firing pass and made a lucky hit through the top of our left wing, about 8 feet from the fuselage through the wing flap. It exploded into the fuselage in the area of the #1 main tank and knocked out our intercom. We felt a good whap and all three of us were a little bit anxious (scared) but doing our mission as briefed, basically because of habit. I firmly believe that’s what good, tough, LeMay-type, SAC training did for his combat crews. Later we also found out, it hit our UHF radio in a way that it would not channelize but was stuck on channel 13, our command post common.

By now we had covered our last photo target and had turned due west toward Finland to get the hell out of there. That flight of six ran out of range I guess and, we were near the Finland border. Real soon another three Migs showed up. Two Migs of this flight made individual firing passes but our added speed obviously made it a bit tougher or I am pretty sure I would not be here writing about this mission today. After those two made passes, on of the Migs came up on our right side, close enough to shake hands and sat there for two or three minutes. Two more Migs tried firing passes, but without hitting us, by this time we were well out of Soviet territory. At the debriefing in Omaha, General LeMay asked, ?Why were you not shot down?? My answer was that there was no doubt in my mind the Mig-17 pilots could have shot us down, if they had been willing to come right up our tailpipes! He made a statement that he was “convinced that most fighter pilots are basically cowards anyway.” General LeMay also said, “There are probably several openings today in command positions there, since you were not shot down.”

Our excitement for this mission was not over. An airborne stand-by KC-97 tanker was holding for us about 50 miles from Stavanger, Norway. We really weren’t sure how the damage to our left wing and fuselage would effect fuel consumption. Initially it didn’t look that bad. As we came into radio range of our airborne tanker I heard him calling (garbled) in the blind on command post common, the only working part of our UHF radio. We were running about 30 minutes behind schedule; I heard the tanker state he was leaving the orbit area at the appointed time. I tried to acknowledge his call but he later said he never heard me transmit anything. Of course they had not been briefed on our mission, but were aware that three B-47’s went through refueling areas that morning and only two had returned.

As we coasted out off Norway, it was obvious we had fallen behind the fuel curve. We climbed to 43,000 feet and throttled back to max-range cruise. It did appear however, that we could get to a base in England and we knew there was a strip alert tanker at Mildenhall awaiting our call. My co-Pilot had spent much of the time since the last Migs departed sitting in the aisle acting as the intercom between me and NAV. You just don’t realize how handy the intercom is until you don’t have one in a tandem airplane.

Holt was beginning to panic on the fuel as we reached a point about 150 miles from the Wash. He said all this effort was for naught if we have to bail out of the airplane, and left no film for intelligence to process that would prove where we had been. Within about 100 miles of the Wash, I started calling for the stirp alert tanker to launch. Jim Rigley, the tanker pilot, said he heard a word or two, enough to recognize my voice (these were our tanker guys, so we all knew each other.) Anyway, he attempted to get permission to launch. Well, as it sometimes goes, the RAF had an emergency working. Rigley announced that he was launching anyway and did. When he returned to base, the Base Commander threatened him with a court martial and British Air Traffic Control gave him a violation, both situations were later “fixed” by General LeMay.

In all of my nine years of flying up to that time, I was never more thrilled to see another airplane in the air than I was to see that beautiful KC-97 that day. I saw Rigley’s airplane and headed for it. We had already decided to land if need be at Brize Norton, and were letting down to do just that. Holt said, “We’re going to run out of gas.” Rigley had his guys looking up for us and caught a glimpse of what they thought was our airplane and leveled off at 3,000 feet heading south. I circled once letting down. As we maneuvered and pulled into contact position, Holt said, “We are taking on fuel.” He swears to this day, all tank gauges showed empty when we made contact. I told Holt to tell me when we had 12,000 pounds of fuel. When he said NOW, I punched the boom loose, gave the Boom Operator a salute and headed for Fairford. We buzzed the tower and as we came around they gave us a green light to land.

When we reached the ramp and parked, the crewchief was first up the ladder, “What the hell kind of seagull did you hit?”

Because of the “need to know” classification, my crew was never allowed to see the pictures we took that day, but General LeMay said they were really good.